Care of Persons With Disabilities in Social Work – is It Possible to Change the Approach From the Client to the Individual?

Vesna Šućur-Janjetović, Andrea Rakanović Radonjić

Abstract


Social protection of persons with disability represents a topic that requires deep analysis of all significant aspects which include social approach, professional support, as well as the needs and capacities of an individual. This paper includes a theoretical framework for understanding social work models with persons with disability, as well as the underpinning critical social work paradigm. The authors used the above-mentioned theoretical framework to conduct the research and find the answer to the research question. Social workers that participated in this research were hand-picked due to their engagement in the health and social institutions that provide residential social care, and work with clients that are capable of actively participating and making decisions on their own during treatment. The method used for data collection in this research was the focus group method and in depth-interviews as a technic. The research findings presented in this paper indicate that traditional models, medical and social models of social work with persons with disability are being used in practice, with some elements of the third model – the embodiment model. The fourth contemporary model that enables the shift in the social work approach from client to person, using the embodiment model has not been recognized by the social workers that contributed to this research. It is also worth mentioning that the elements of the third and fourth social work models with persons with disability have been present in the social workers’ practice. This topic is very much current and requires attention from the science and practice of social work, facing new challenges and at the same time offering new potential directions for research in this social work field.

Keywords


persons with disability, critical social work; approaches and models; individual

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alston, Margaret, Wendy Bowles (2013), Research for Social Workers – An introduction to methods, Routledge, London

Barney, Keith W. (2012), ˝Disability simulations: Using the social model of disability to update an experiential educational practice imprint˝, SCHOLE: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 27(1), 1–11.

Bingham Cecilie, Linda Clarke, Elisabeth Michielsens, Marc Van de Meer (2013), ˝Towards a social model approach? British and Dutch disability policies in the health sector compared˝, Personnel Review, 42, 613–637.

Blustein, Jeffrey (2012), ˝Philosophical and ethical issues in disability˝, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 9, 573587.

Bolt, David (2020), ˝Complex and critical: A methodological application of the tripartite model of disability˝, u: Linda Ware (ed.), Critical Readings in Interdisciplinary Disability Studies: (Dis)Assemblages, Springer Cham, 69-78.

Brandon, Toby, Gary Pritchard (2011), ˝“Being fat”: A conceptual analysis using three models of disability˝, Disability & Society, 26(1), 79–92.

Brittain, Ian (2004), ˝Perceptions of disability and their impact upon involvement in sport for people with disabilities at all levels˝, Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 28(4), 429-452.

Coles, Jonathan (2001), ˝The social model of disability: What does it mean for practice in services for people with learning difficulties?˝, Disability & Society, 16(4), 501–510.

Ćuk, Mira, Andrea Rakanović Radonjić (2020), ˝Socijalna podrška studentima sa invaliditetom u funkciji socijalne uključenosti˝, Društvene i humanističke studije, 2(11), 381-406.

Direkcija za ekonomsko planiranje Bosne i Hercegovine, Federalno ministarstvo rada i socijalne politike, Ministarstvo zdravlja i socijalne zaštite Republike Srpske, IBHI – Nezavisni biro za humanitarna pitanja (2009), Politika u oblasti invalidnosti u Bosni i Hercegovini

Fitzgerald, Hayley (2006), ˝Disability and physical education˝, In: Kirk, David, Doune MacDonald, Mary O’Sullivan (Eds.), The handbook of physical education, SAGE, London, England, 752–766.

Flintoff, Anne, Hayley Fitzgerald, Sheila Scraton (2008), ˝The challenges of intersectionality: Researching differences in physical education˝, International Studies in Sociology of Education, 18(2), 73–85.

Forhan, Mary (2009), ˝An analysis of disability models and the application of the ICF to obesity˝, Disability and Rehabilitation, 31(16), 1382–1388.

Goodley, Dan (2001), ˝Learning difficulties, the social model of disability and impairment: Challenging epistemologies˝, Disability & Society, 16(2), 207–231.

Grenier, Michelle A. (2011), ˝Coteaching in physical education: A strategy for inclusive practice˝, Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 28(2), 95–112.

Haegele, Justin A., Samuel Hodge (2016), ˝Disability Discourse: Overview and Critiques of the Medical and Social Models˝, QUEST, 68, 2, 193-206

Humpage, Louise (2007), ˝Models of disability, work and welfare in Australia˝, Social Policy & Administration, 41(3), 215–231.

Ife, Jim (2013), Community development in an uncertain world, Cambridge University Press

LoBianco, Anthony F., Kathy Sheppard-Jones (2008), ˝Perceptions of disability as related to medical and social factors˝, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(1), 1–13.

Marks, Beth A. (2000), ˝Jumping through hoops and walking on egg shells or discrimination, having, and abuse of students with disabilities?˝, Journal of Nursing Education, 39(5), 205–210.

Marks, Deborah (1999), ˝Dimensions of Oppression: Theorising the embodied subject˝, Disability & Society, 14(5), 611–626.

Mitra, Sophie (2006), ˝The capability approach and disability˝, Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16(4), 236-247.

Oliver, Mike, Colin Barnes (2012), The new politics of disablement, Palgrave Macmillan. New York, NY

Palmer, Michael, David Harley (2012), ˝Models and measurement in disability: An international review˝, Health Policy and Planning, 27(5), 357–364.

Pease, Bob (ed.) (2016), Doing critical social work: Transformative practice for social justice, Routledge, London

Roush, Susan E., Nancy Sharby (2011), ˝Disability reconsidered: The paradox of physical therapy˝, Physical Therapy, 91(12), 1715–1727.

Shuttleworth, Russell (2016), ˝Social work, disability and social change: a critical participatory approach˝, in: Pease, Bob (ed.), Doing critical social work: Transformative practice for social justice, Routledge, London, 298-309.

Shildrick, Margrit (2009), Dangerous Discourses of Subjectivity, Sexuality and Disability (2nd ed.), Palgrave Macmillan

Siebers, Tobin (2016), ˝Disability and the theory of complex embodiment – for identity politics in a new register˝, in: Lennard J. Davis (ed.), The disability studies reader, Chapter 22, Routledge, 313-332.

Skoko, Božo, Vanesa Benković (2009), ˝Znanstvena metoda fokus grupa – mogućnosti i načini primjene˝, Politička misao, 46(3), 217-236.

Škorić, Jovana, Marko Škorić (2020), ˝Rekonceptualizacija Freirevog nasljeđa u kontekstu socijalnog rada˝, Ljetopis socijalnog rada, 27(1), 57-82.

Vlada Republike Srpske (2016), Strategija unapređenja društvenog položaja osoba sa invaliditetom u Republici Srpskoj 2017-2026.

Zakon o socijalnoj zaštiti Republike Srpske, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske“, broj: 37/12, 90/16, 94/19, 41/20 i 36/22.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.51558/2490-3647.2023.8.2.749

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 2490-3604 (print) ● ISSN: 2490-3647 (online)

Društvene i humanističke studije - DHS is under the Creative Commons licence.